The plans by the immediate past governor of Kogi state, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, to embark on a honeymoon with his new wife, Hiqma, has been dashed by Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja.
The court refused his request for the release of his international passport to enable him travel for medical vacation
A source close to the the ex-governor told KUBMEDIA that Bello had planned to embarked on the journey with his new wife, if his request had been granted by the court.
But his hope of having a honeymoon with the new wife was dashed after the court refused his request.
The source said, “The former governor has planned to travel with his new wife, if his request for medical vacation had been granted.
“But that hope has now been dashed with the ruling, of the court on his request for medical trip”.
Last weekend, Yahaya Bello married a fourth wife, Hiqma, in a ceremony held over the weekend in Abuja.
The private event was attended by close friends and family members.
Confirmation of the marriage came through an Instagram post by Bello’s third wife, Hafiza Yahaya Bello, who publicly welcomed Hiqma to the family
“Our family just got a little bigger and more loving,” she wrote, expressing gratitude and praying for peace and blessings in their home”.
Bello, who governed Kogi State from 2016 to 2023 under the All Progressives Congress (APC), was previously married to Amina Oyiza Bello, Rashida Yahaya Bello and Hafiza Bello.
The court, Monday, in refusing the application said the medical report presented by Bello was not signed by its maker.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, had argued that the application was an abuse of court process.
The defendant had applied for the release of his travel document to enable him travel to the United Kingdom for medical attention.
Bella’s lawyer, Joseph Daudu, SAN, had presented Exhibits A and B, which constituted expert report on the health status of the applicant, saying that sufficient materials had been placed before the court to exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant.
Prosecution, while urging the court to dismiss the application, noted that the reliefs sought were similar and that the motion was technically incompetent as the sureties to the defendant were not informed.
On the issue of suretyship, the Court held that the matter before it was Yahaya Bello v. FRN, and not vs the sureties.
The judge further aligned with the argument of the counsel to the defendant, ruling that the surety ought not to be included in the application.
“The counsel to the complainant did not cite any section of the law that says sureties should be given notice or made a party in the motion on notice.
“The counsel did not cite any law, whether locally or internationally, to back his argument.
“On the abuse of process of court, it is the argument of the complainant that the instant application is incompetent and amount to abuse of court process.
“It is not in dispute that the applicant is standing trial before this court and FCT court and it is not in dispute that the applicant was granted bail in this court on December 13, 2024 and at FCT High acourt on December 19, 2024.
“The FCT High Court, in its ruling, said that the applicant must seek the leave of the court. Hence, this instant application does not amount to abuse of court process.
“It is also the fact that this court and the FCT High Court are courts of coordinate jurudiction,” Justice Nwite stated.
The court, however, held that Exhibit B, which was the medical report provided by a doctor, was not signed by its maker, and as such, lacked any legal efficacy.
The Court emphasised that an unsigned document carries no weight in law and is considered worthless.
In other words, Exhibit B is devoid of probative value and cannot be relied upon by the Court, the judge held.
“The defendant has failed to place sufficient material before this court for his passport to be released for him to travel. Consequently, this application is hereby refused,” Justice Nwite said.
The case was thereafter adjourned to October 7 and 10 and November 10 and 11, 2025, for continuation of trial.
End
