Lawyer Writes CJ, Seeks Withdrawal Of Case From Judge Over Alleged Partisanship, Manifest Bias
By Tope Kolawole
Human Rights lawyer, Victor Giwa, has petitioned the Chief Judge of the High Court of Justice of the Federal Capital Territory over allegation partisanship and manifest bias against a judge of the court, Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie.
Giwa and one other are standing trial over allegation of forgery.
The police had accused Giwa of forging letterhead paper of a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Chief Awa Kalu.
But Awa Kalu, in a letter to the Inspector General of Police, Mr Kayode. Egebtolun, put a lie to the allegation of the police against Bukola Ibitade and Giwa.
Despite the letter of Prof. Awa Kalu to the Inspector-General of Police, formally distancing himself from the allegation of forgery and impersonation against Giwa and Ibitade, the police have gone ahead to press charge against Giwa.
Chief Kalu, in a letter to the Inspector-General of Police, Mr Kayode Egbetokun, had said his letterhead was never forged and that he had not at anytime lodged any complaint to the police about forgery of his document.
Professor Kalu, in a letter dated May 30, 2025, addressed to the Inspector General of Police, clarified that he neither filed a complaint nor reported Mr. Giwa for allegedly forging his firm’s letterhead.
Giwa, in the letter to the CJ, dated November 12, 2025, said “My Lord, recall that I and the 2nd Defendant in this Charge were charged for the offences of conspiracy, forgery among others as shown on the face of the Charge Sheet attached to this Letter as “Annexure A”.
“On the 15th day of September 2025, the Court proceeded to hear the matter and issued bench warrant against me and the 2nd Defendant for failure to attend the Court’s procecdings without assuring itself of personal service of the Charge on me; On the 8th day of Ocober 2025 when my bail application was heard and granted by the Court, the Court amended its Ruling on my bail application to include an order of detention should I ail to meet the stringent conditions of bail granted to me in my abeence and in the absence of ny Counsel. ”
He said in the letter to the CJ that the court turther failed to hear his applications challengtig the jurisdiction of court and proceeded to hear the substantive matter on 30th Octaber, 2025.
He also said that on the 12th dav of November 2005, the court suo moto identified Motion No: M/13797/25 that i filed seeking the Court to recuse itself and started delivering its ruling on the sald Motion when the Motion had not yet been moved.
“It took the intervention of the Legal Adviser (LA) of the Court to pause the Ruling when His Lordship was about 2 minutes into the ruling, that was when the Court ordered the Motion to be moved.
“The lawyers in Court and I were shocked and I almost fainted in the Court betore I was called upon by the Court to move the said Motion. Other Lawyers in Court also wondered at what had happened in the course of the proceedings, seeing (he manifest bias and: partisanship exhibited by the Court against me. All the Lawyers tn court are all wilnens to the judicial absurdity and partisanship of His Lordship on the 12 of November , 2025
“My Lond, I do not believe that I can get substantial justice from the Court of Hon. Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie on the basis of manifest bias and partisanship shown apainst me as justice must not only be done but seen to have been done.
I humbty request for Hon. Justice Jude Onwuegbuzie presiding over the case to recuse himself from the case for manifest bias and conducts capable of ridiculing, the judiciary and undermining, the course of justice based on the above-mentioned grounds and others that will be stated in an Affidavit of Facts attached to this Letter.”
