Prince Emmanuel Kanu, the brother of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has stated that the separatist’s residence is surrounded by a large number of security personnel.
Ahead of the much anticipated ruling on Kanu’s terrorism-related cases, Kanu raised the alarm in a post posted on his Facebook page on Thursday morning.
“Breaking news,” he wrote. Many security personnel are currently stationed around Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s family home. The entire planet is being warned.
According to reports, Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja is scheduled to render a decision today about a number of applications that the Federal Government filed against Kanu.
In the meantime, Omotosho has given security personnel the order to remove Kanu from his courtroom.
According to reports, the IPOB commander became unruly and began raising his voice, which prompted the judge to issue the order.
According to Justice Omotosho, Kanu had brought up the majority of the concerns brought up by the IPOB leader multiple times in this court. “That order is binding on the court,” he said.
However, he stated that it would not be considered in relation to the court of appeals and the stay of proceedings. According Judge Omotosho, there are two kinds of bail, and the matter at hand does not qualify for either. He said that the case’s hearing was over and that he would render his decision.
Kanu disagreed, arguing that he should be allowed to submit his final written address, but the judge asked him to behave himself.
Kanu, however, requested that the court reveal him the location of his final written address in order to waive it.
Nnamdi Kanu said to the court, “You don’t know the law. Show me where it says you can waive the right to a final address. Omotosho show me the law.”
Kanu disregarded the judge’s order to over the microphone to the DSS.
The judge ordered security personnel to remove Nnamdi Kanu from the courtroom when he insisted.
The judge declared that a defendant’s right to attend his trial is protected by the constitution. “We have seen instances where the defendant beats his clients, shutting them up,” the court stated, acknowledging that Kanu’s disruptive behavior is not new.
He made multiple appeals to Kanu, the judge noted, but “in his usual manner, he refused to comport himself.”
Afterwards, the judge mandated that the IPOB leader not be present throughout the proceedings.
